Addressing employer underinvestment in training

The UK has suffered a long-term and substantial decline in employer investment in training over past decades. Figures show declining employee participation in workplace training, and that a substantial portion of the training done is only induction or compliance-based.

As part of an attempt to reverse the trend, the UK Government introduced the Apprenticeship Levy in 2017. The focus of the levy was to increase both the quantity of UK apprenticeships and the quality of new apprenticeships, in addition to spurring employer spending on training. Yet the initiative is not having the desired effect.

It is clear that the levy in its current form should be reviewed and revised. To this end, the CIPD recommends:

Reforming the existing levy into a broader, ringfenced Training Levy. It’s increased scope will include other forms of accredited training, aligned to sector priorities.
Ensure the levy is sustainably funded, allowing it to responsively address local skills supply and demands.

Download the report and infographic and read our recommendations

Report: Addressing employer under-investment in training

Download the report

PDF document 560.6 KB

Infographic: Addressing employer under-investment in training

Download the infographic

PDF document 500 KB

More on this topic

Thought leadership

Leveraging L&D tech to organisational advantage

How can L&D teams can engage with new technologies like generative AI to impact performance?

Podcast

Evidence-based L&D – The gift of AI

Do L&D professionals need greater curiosity to explore how AI can support them and bolster learning outcomes?

Guide

Technology use in learning and development

Guidance on how technology can be used responsibly to help manage people

For Members

Podcast

Evidence-based L&D – Asking the right questions

Podcast 202: Learning professionals are under constant pressure to demonstrate the value and impact of their interventions. Is there a way for them to bolster their chances of a successful outcome before they dive into planning?